Theory Meets Reality
The five principles aren't abstract philosophy. They're responses to documented patterns of accountability failure. Each case study below shows what happens when accountability diffuses—and how specific principles would have prevented the harm.
The 2003 Iraq War: Diffused Accountability for False Premises
What Happened
The United States invaded Iraq based on claims that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and posed an imminent threat. The Bush administration presented intelligence to Congress and the public asserting these claims with certainty.
The claims proved false. No WMDs were found. The intelligence had been selectively presented, dissenting voices suppressed, and uncertainties omitted. The war resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths, trillions in costs, regional destabilization, and the rise of ISIS.
Despite the catastrophic consequences and false premises, no individual decision-maker faced personal accountability. The system diffused responsibility across institutions: Congress voted for authorization, intelligence agencies provided assessments, the executive branch made the final decision. When everything went wrong, no one was specifically liable.
The Accountability Failure
- Diffused Decision-Making: Authorization spread across 373 members of Congress—too many to hold individually accountable
- No Skin in the Game: Of those 373 legislators, fewer than 5 had children in military service. They decided, others died.
- Opacity: Intelligence presented to Congress and the public was selectively curated. Dissenting CIA assessments were suppressed. Full picture not available until years later.
- No Personal Consequences: When WMDs weren't found, no one lost their job, faced prosecution, or bore personal cost. Institutional failure with no individual liability.
How the Framework Would Have Changed This
Traceability: Every legislator's vote would be permanently recorded with their stated rationale. "I voted yes because intelligence showed [specific claims]." When those claims proved false, the record is immutable and attributable.
Skin in the Game: Any legislator voting for offensive military action would face immediate enlistment obligation for themselves or immediate family members. The vote would have been very different if personal sacrifice was mandatory.
Transparency: All intelligence assessments, including dissenting views, would be accessible to Congress in unredacted form. No selective curation. Classified temporarily, but released post-facto for accountability.
Barriers to Violence: 90-day automatic sunset. After 90 days, explicit re-authorization required with updated rationale addressing "Have WMDs been found? If not, what's the continued justification?" Forces ongoing democratic deliberation.
Sources:
Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Report on the U.S. Intelligence Community's Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq. July 2004.
Costs of War Project, Watson Institute, Brown University. Iraqi Civilians. Accessed 2025.
Pew Research Center. Public Attitudes Toward the War in Iraq: 2003-2008. March 2008.
The 2008 Financial Crisis: Regulatory Capture and Diffused Liability
What Happened
Major financial institutions created and sold mortgage-backed securities filled with loans they knew would likely default. Credit rating agencies gave AAA ratings to toxic assets. Regulators who were supposed to prevent systemic risk either didn't understand the products or chose not to intervene.
When the housing bubble burst, it triggered a global financial crisis. Millions lost their homes. Unemployment spiked. Trillions in wealth evaporated. Governments bailed out the institutions responsible using taxpayer money.
Almost no individual bankers faced prosecution. Institutions paid fines—often less than the profits made from the fraudulent activity. Regulators who failed to prevent the crisis faced no consequences. The revolving door between Wall Street and regulatory agencies continued uninterrupted.
The Accountability Failure
- Regulatory Capture: SEC officials and ratings agency employees often came from—and returned to—the industries they regulated. Structural incentive to go easy.
- Diffused Liability: Decisions made by committees, teams, and processes. When fraud was documented, institutions paid fines but individuals rarely prosecuted.
- No Skin in the Game: Bankers who created toxic products didn't hold them. They sold the risk to others while keeping bonuses. When it collapsed, they kept their wealth.
- Opacity: Complex financial instruments deliberately designed to be incomprehensible. Even sophisticated investors couldn't assess true risk.
How the Framework Would Have Changed This
Sortition for Oversight: Replace career SEC regulators with rotating panels of randomly selected citizens with subpoena power. They ask simple questions: "Would you invest your retirement in this? Why is it rated AAA if you wouldn't?" No revolving door incentive.
Mandatory Skin in the Game: Any executive approving a financial product must hold a significant portion of their net worth in it for a minimum lock-up period. If you won't hold it, you can't sell it.
Traceability: Every approval of a financial product traces to named individuals: "John Smith, Chief Risk Officer, approved this product on [date] accepting personal liability for material misrepresentation." No hiding behind "the firm approved it."
Transparency: All structured financial products require plain-language explanations accessible to the public. If you can't explain it simply, you can't sell it. Real-time public database of all derivatives and their holders.
Sources:
Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report. January 2011.
Sorkin, Andrew Ross. Too Big to Fail. Viking Press, 2009.
U.S. Department of Justice. Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force Annual Report. 2015.
Opioid Crisis: Pharmaceutical Approval Without Skin in the Game
What Happened
Purdue Pharma aggressively marketed OxyContin as a safe, non-addictive pain reliever. They funded studies, lobbied doctors, and minimized addiction risks. The FDA approved the drug and its marketing claims despite contrary evidence about opioid addiction.
Over 500,000 Americans died from opioid overdoses between 1999 and 2020. Millions more became addicted. Families destroyed. Communities devastated. The crisis continues.
Purdue Pharma eventually pled guilty and paid fines. The Sackler family, who owned Purdue and profited billions, largely protected their wealth through bankruptcy proceedings. FDA officials who approved the drug and its marketing faced no personal consequences.
The Accountability Failure
- No Skin in the Game: FDA reviewers who approved OxyContin didn't take it or give it to their families. Decision-makers bore no personal risk from approval.
- Regulatory Capture: Pharmaceutical industry funding influenced research. Some FDA officials later took positions in pharma companies they had regulated.
- Diffused Accountability: Approval went through committees and processes. When the addiction crisis became clear, no specific individual was held personally responsible.
- Profit Without Liability: Sacklers extracted billions while creating bankruptcy structures that protected personal wealth from liability. They profited immensely while victims got pennies.
How the Framework Would Have Changed This
Mandatory Skin in the Game: Any FDA official approving a pharmaceutical for widespread use must take it themselves at prescribed dosages (or have family members take it if it's for a condition they don't have). Personal stake in safety.
Traceability: "Dr. Jane Smith, Dr. Robert Chen, and five others approved OxyContin for marketing as non-addictive on [date]. They are personally liable if marketing claims prove false or addiction rates exceed stated predictions."
Sortition for Review: Random citizen panels review pharmaceutical approvals with full access to trial data. They ask: "Would you give this to your child? What are you not telling us about risks?" No career regulators with industry ties.
No Liability Shield for Profits: If a product causes documented mass harm through negligence or fraud, all profits from that product are forfeit. Personal wealth of decision-makers is not shielded by corporate structure.
Sources:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Understanding the Opioid Overdose Epidemic. Updated 2024.
U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The Role of Purdue Pharma and the Sackler Family in the Opioid Epidemic. December 2020.
Keefe, Patrick Radden. Empire of Pain: The Secret History of the Sackler Dynasty. Doubleday, 2021.
Help Build the Evidence
These are just three examples. The pattern repeats across domains: diffused accountability, opacity, misaligned incentives, and no skin in the game.
If you have well-documented cases of accountability failure, submit them. We're building a public database of system failures and how specific principles would address them.
Submit Evidence